Amenbible

verse by verse bible reading


LAW (1) – JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH

Back to Main Page

LAW (1) – JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH


INTRODUCTION
It has been proclaimed often by modern teaching that righteousness is attained through faith in the New Covenant. In contrast, under Law or the under the Old Covenant, people were justified obeying the law.

Again, it is declared by the same preachers that the Law was revealed on Mount Sinai, while grace, the hallmark of the New Covenant, is found on Mount Zion. Indeed, this teaching asserted that God has shifted His dwelling place from one mountain to the other. Therefore, it is urged believers to abandon the Law i.e. Sinai, and ascend to Mount Zion.

In a separate teaching, drawing from the words of Hebrews chapter 4, the same teaching explained that the ancient Israelites failed to enter God’s promised rest due to a deficiency of faith. Faith, according to this modern teaching, is embodied in the person of Jesus Christ. As He had not yet been revealed, the Israelites of old were unable to experience the fullness of God’s rest.


(2) JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH (ROMANS 4)
However, a compelling passage by St. Paul in Romans 4:1-8 offers a different perspective from this modern teaching. Both the NIV and NKJV subtitle this section “Abraham Justified by Faith.” Let’s consider the text:

“1 What then shall we say that Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh, discovered in this matter?
2 If, in fact, Abraham was justified by works, he had something to boast about—but not before God.
3 What does Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.”
4 Now to the one who works, wages are not credited as a gift but as an obligation.
5 However, to the one who does not work but trusts God who justifies the ungodly, their faith is credited as righteousness.
6 David says the same thing when he speaks of the blessedness of the one to whom God credits righteousness apart from works:
7 “Blessed are those
whose transgressions are forgiven,
whose sins are covered.

8 Blessed is the one
whose sin the Lord will never count against them. (NIV)”


Verily, as it is written in Romans 4:1-8, two men were declared righteous through faith, having believed in God. It is curious to note that both of these men, Abraham our father and King David hailed from the times before the Law.

Now, according to modern teaching, righteousness was attainable only through adherence to the Law given to Moses. Yet, here we find a contradiction to this notion. According to Paul, both Abraham and Kong David were justified not by deeds of the Law, but by faith


JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH (PSALM 32)
Let’s consider King David. How did he see himself as justified and blessed? Romans 4 verses 7-8 draw quotation from Psalm 32. Let’s read the entire psalm to understand better:

Psalm 32:1-5
1 Blessed is the one
whose transgressions are forgiven,
whose sins are covered.
2 Blessed is the one
whose sin the Lord does not count against them
and in whose spirit is no deceit.

3 When I kept silent,
my bones wasted away
through my groaning all day long.
4 For day and night
your hand was heavy on me;
my strength was sapped
as in the heat of summer.
5 Then I acknowledged my sin to you 
and did not cover up my iniquity.
I said, “I will confess
my transgressions to the Lord.”
And you forgave
the guilt of my sin. (NIV)


How was King David justified in Psalm 32?
The answer is straightforward:

– he confessed his sins.
– David recognized himself as blessed because God did not judge him according to the law but forgave his iniquities and transgressions because he confessed his sin, as stated in verse 5.


EXCLUSION OF BOASTING
Are we understanding this correctly?

Let’s consider Romans 3:27-28:
27 Where, then, is boasting? It is excluded. Because of what law? The law that requires works? No, because of the law that requires faith.
28 For we maintain that a person is justified by faith apart from the works of the law. (NIV)

In a nutshell, the passage emphasizes that boasting is excluded because justification is not based on works but on faith. This means that no one can claim superiority or merit based on their efforts.

Some translations refer to verse 27 as the Law Of Faith.” Regardless of the phrasing, these verses highlight two main points:
1) The law does not require works for justification. Believers cannot meet the law’s requirements through their actions, a principle that applies both to the old covenant and the new.

2) The law requires faith.

God’s method of justification has been consistent throughout history: from before the law was given, through the time of Mount Sinai (when the law was given), and up to the new covenant at Mount Zion. God justifies people through faith in Him. Our unchanging God remains The Same Yesterday, Today, And Forever.” There is not one God for the old covenant and another for the new.

Confusion often arises from mixing:
1) Works of the law
2) Faith in the law


LAW OF FAITH VS. WORKS OF THE LAW
Paul contrasts the “law that requires works” with the “law that requires faith.” Here, the “law of faith” can be understood as a principle or rule that emphasizes that faith, rather than works, is the basis for justification. This principle is not new but consistent with God’s character and His dealings with humanity.

Hebrews 11 lists many figures who were justified by faith under the old covenant. Additionally, modern teachings sometimes assert that 1 John 1:9 (confession of sin) does not apply to believers, while also suggesting that believers should confess their sins because they are already forgiven. This can create conflicting messages. If all sins are already forgiven, what is there left to confess?


CONSISTENCY OF JUSTIFICATION
– The idea that God’s method of justification has always been by faith is a significant theological point. The Old Testament figures such as Abraham (Genesis 15:6) and King David were justified by faith, not by their works. This principle is reiterated in the New Testament (e.g., Romans 4).

– Indeed, whether under the old or new covenant, He justifies people by faith in Him. Confession of sins is not a work; it is an act of faith or belief in God’s promises. Abraham did not earn God’s promise through his works but by responding with faith.

When King David was confronted with his sin, he didn’t try to earn God’s forgiveness through his efforts. Instead, he confessed his wrongdoing, trusting that this was the path to redemption.

To clarify, it’s important to consider this topic within the context of Romans 3 and 4, especially if there are concerns about misinterpretation. Some might argue that these passages are addressing Self-Righteousness rather than the law itself. However, Romans 3:31 clarifies this misunderstanding: “Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Not at all! Rather, we uphold the law” (NIV).

Moreover, Romans 4:13 underscores that Abraham and his descendants received the promise not through the law, but through faith: “It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith” (NIV). Romans 4:14 further explains, “For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless” (NIV).

Romans 4:1-8 is situated between Romans 3:29 and Romans 4:13, reinforcing that the discussion concerns the law rather than self-righteousness.


CONCLUSION
In conclusion, justification has always been by faith, both in the Old and New Testaments. Confusion around works, confession, and faith often arises from different Christian interpretations. Recognizing that confession and good works are expressions of faith, not mechanisms of justification, helps clarify these issues.

King David’s experience shows that forgiveness isn’t automatic. Despite being called a “MAN AFTER GOD’S OWN HEART,” his pleas for pardon reveal the need for repentance and grace. The New Covenant internalizes the law through the Holy Spirit, calling believers to live in harmony with it as an expression of faith.

Unlike the Word of Faith movement’s prosperity gospel based on declarations, Scripture highlights God’s sovereignty and promises. Abraham’s blessing, for example, depended on God’s promise to Abraham for Isaac first, not human decree, or self-proclamation and declaration. Again, God’s promise comes first. Amenbible


READ:-
Believe – John 3:16
See Jesus: (1 Corinthians 10)
End Times:- The Book Of Life Opens
1 JOHN 1:9

ONE FIFTH MUCH MORE RESTORATION 
BALAAM
ARISE, SHINE



Past Postings

  • WORTHY LIVING

    Back to Main PageA well-known politician used to say that he spent all his life building a nation. Similarly, as believers, we have to use and build our earthly lives for eternity. We have to walk rightly for our next glorious eternality. Salvation comes with a cost. Not just reciting a sinner prayer alone. (Ephesians…

    Read more: WORTHY LIVING
  • 末世:哈米吉多顿

    多年来,关于哈米吉多顿的解释至少有六种主流观点: 1)王国论 这种观点认为,“七王”象征着曾经压迫上帝子民的历代世界帝国,例如埃及、亚述、巴比伦、米底波斯、希腊以及未来的罗马。人们常常认为,最终的“第八个”王国是复兴的罗马帝国。 2)罗马皇帝论 另一种解释认为,“七王”指的就是罗马皇帝。这些罗马皇帝分别是尤利乌斯·凯撒、奥古斯都、提比略、卡利古拉和克劳狄乌斯。这种观点认为,“第八位”是一位未来的统治者,他象征着兽,可能是复活的尼禄。 3)诗篇 83 有些人将启示录 17 章中的“十角”解读为与诗篇 83 篇中提到的联盟相关的统治者。如今,这些地区通常与约旦、黎巴嫩、叙利亚、伊拉克、沙特阿拉伯和巴勒斯坦领土等国家联系在一起,这些国家被视为在末世联合起来对抗以色列。从这个角度来看,持续不断的中东冲突引起了人们的关注。 4)西欧 一些观点认为,最终的西欧超级大国,其根基在于罗马帝国的遗产,就是“兽”或北方之王,它率领全球军队前往哈米吉多顿与基督决战。 5)全球主义势力(美国) 另一些观点则认为,美国在这个西方“兽”体系中扮演着重要角色,可能就是《启示录》13章中的“第二兽”;这个超级大国强制推行“兽印”,并支持最终在哈米吉多顿决战中对抗基督的全球秩序。 6)全球联盟 更广泛地说,在这些解读中,西欧和美国的势力通常都被视为反对基督的更广泛联盟的一部分。 五大帝国覆灭 确切地说,哈米吉多顿之战是但以理关于巨像、四兽和七十个七的异象的延续。事实上,巨像和兽的异象是对同一预言的平行描述。 在那个异象中,罗马帝国由铁的两条腿代表,预言帝国最终分裂为西罗马帝国和东罗马帝国。这进一步延伸到西欧和东欧。 因此,在但以理关于巨像和兽的异象中,出现的是五只兽,而不是四只。它们描绘了世界权力通过五个连续帝国的更迭:巴比伦、米底波斯、希腊、两条腿;即西罗马和东罗马。西罗马和东罗马的兴衰时间并不相同。这表明它们并非由同一兽的体系所掌控,而应被视为两个不同的帝国。西罗马迅速衰落,而东罗马则延续了数个世纪。最终,他们演变成了拜占庭帝国。 启示录17:10确实宣告:“五个已经倾覆,一个还在,一个还没有到来。” 这五个倾覆的王国是巴比伦、米底波斯、希腊,以及罗马帝国的两条腿—西罗马帝国和东罗马帝国。第六个王国将从东方兴起,参与哈米吉多顿之战。最后的一只兽将爆发歌革和玛各之战。 十个脚趾 但以理书2:42-45和但以理书第7章,正如AMPC译本所揭示,雕像的十个脚趾由铁和泥土混合而成,代表末世的十位君王。 这十个君王,也就是这十个脚趾,最终将被那块石头击碎,这块石头能粉碎铁、铜、泥土、银和金。虽然巴比伦、波斯、希腊和罗马这些金属所象征的帝国早已覆灭,但预言表明,巴比伦体系本身会一直延续到脚趾(即十个王国)被摧毁为止。因此,重点不在于孤立的统治者或兽像,而在于贯穿各个国家的庞大兽性体系,这个体系最终将被彻底清除。 所以,当信徒试图解读哈米吉多顿之战时,他们的理解必须与雕像异象中所揭示的全部真理相符。埃及和亚述都不能被纳入这个预言中,因为它们不属于这个神圣雕像框架的一部分。这个框架只有巴比伦、米底波斯、希腊,以及罗马帝国的两条腿—西罗马帝国和东罗马帝国。并没提出埃及和亚述。 来自东方的君王 启示录16:12宣告:“幼发拉底大河干涸,为聚集在哈米吉多顿的东方君王预备道路。” 的确,神亲自动工,使幼发拉底大河干涸,为东方的列国预备哈米吉多顿之战。本质上,神是在邀请东方列国参与这场战争。然而,许多人声称即将到来的强权将来自西欧或美洲。圣经对此无法一致。只需看看世界地图上幼发拉底大河的位置,就能分辨出谁位于东方。 以此为基础,我们现在将踏上期待已久的末日之旅。 哈米吉多顿 哈米吉多顿是神圣力量与邪恶势力(或毁灭者)之间最终决战的地点之一。在解读圣经时,必须认识到《启示录》多次以两次叙述的方式呈现了末世事件。换句话说,末世事件的展开是以两个或多个平行顺序呈现的。例如: 十四万四千人分别在第7章和第14章中被提及。 同样,哈米吉多顿也以平行形式出现在《启示录》9:11和16:16中。 雕像和四兽 圣经总是在不同经节多次揭示预言事件。因此,为了更全面地理解,最好将平行事件合并在一起。关于同一末世事件如何在《启示录》中两次被揭示的更多细节,将在后续章节中单独讨论。 哈米吉多顿之战的目的 启示录 9:20-21 和启示录 16:9 揭示了上帝使幼发拉底河干涸的原因,是为了邀请那些心硬如铁、亵渎神明、悖逆上帝、崇拜异教神明的人在哈米吉多顿或“审判谷”与祂决战。 预言间隙与大灾难 根据时代论的“预言间隙”神学观点,教会时代被插入到但以理书第69个七年和第70个七年之间。这意味着但以理书最后七年的时间在教会时代停止或暂停。只有在被提之后,第70个七年才会以其预定的狂暴展开。 基于这种教义,被提预计会发生在: 1) 灾前, 2) 灾中,或 3) 灾后。 但以理的七十个七 然而,在之前基于但以理书第9章和启示录第12章的“末世:但以理的七十个七”研究中,已经确定,我们已经进入了但以理的七十个七。确切地说,我们现在正接近预言的七年时期中前三年半的结点。这表明教会时代并非位于但以理的第六十九个七和第七十个七之间的停顿或是所谓的“预言间隙”。鉴于此,我们已经进入了大灾难时期,最终将在哈米吉多顿大战之前以基督的救赎而告终。但以理的七十个七中并不存在间隙或停顿。…

    Read more: 末世:哈米吉多顿
  • 末世:但以理的70个7

    这项研究表明,我们现在正生活在但以理书第九章七十个七预言的最后一个“七”中。教会时代在但以理书第六十九个七和最后一个七之间并不存在“预言时间间隔 (Prophetic Time Gap)”。这意味着,但以理的预言时间线从第六十九个七到第七十个七之间没有间断。 重要的是,在当前的教会时代,我们已经进入了最后一个七的前三年半。这前三年半被称为大灾难 (Great Tribulation),它将以“哈米吉多顿 (Armageddon)”之战结束。 而后三年半被称为“神的忿怒 (Wrath of God)”,它将以“歌革和玛各 (Gog and Magog)”之战结束。 随着人类时间的流逝,我们可以确信,祂神圣启示的完全性即将结束。无论我们欣然接受还是抗拒这一重要真理,我们都生活在但以理雕像十个脚趾所象征的时代。但以理七十个七的预言时间线也是但以理雕像的一部分。让我们一起来解读以下经文。 但以理的预言展开  除了启示录之外,但以理书第九章或许为理解末世论提供了最直接、最深刻的预言框架。 受耶利米七十个七的预言警告的感动,但以理向神深切祷告,承认祂子民的罪,恳求祂的怜悯和复兴(但以理书 9:3-21)。主垂听并回应了他这发自内心的祷告。天使加百列奉差遣来到但以理面前,带来神圣的启示,揭示了七十个七的更大旨意;这是神为实现祂救赎计划而预定的预言时间表(但以理书 9:23-24)。 在但以理书 9:25,天使加百列向但以理提供了更多关于七十个七年时间表的细节: (1) 从下令重建重建圣殿之时起,将有七个七年(七个七年)。 (2) 然后,经过六十二个七年(62 x 7;或 62 个七年周期)之后,受膏者将被处死或剪除。显然,受膏者指的是耶稣被钉在十字架上。 (3) 最后一个七年周期 总结并强调, 这一预言由“7 + 62 + 1”的结构构成,共计 70 个七年周期,展现了一个神圣的计划: ~ 复兴(7 个七年周期 / 49 年), ~ 启示(62 个七年周期 / 434 年),以及 ~ 救赎(1…

    Read more: 末世:但以理的70个7